Resist Terminology Changes: Embrace the Power of Words

Share This Post

Illustration of a light skin woman in short hair wearing glasses and burgundy shirt signing "enough"

Efforts to rename deafness by non-deaf individuals are not new and have historical roots in assimilation attempts of Deaf individuals into hearing culture. The Milan Conference of 1880 serves as a stark example, where sign language was banned for 150 years in favour of oralism, erasing Deaf culture and language.

Currently, some professionals lacking lived experience, such as doctors, audiologists, and Auditory-Verbal Therapists (AVTs), are using euphemistic terms like “hearing differences” or “reduced hearing,” risking perpetuation of this assimilation legacy. It’s similar when people try to use different words instead of “disability.” Learning from history is crucial to ensure language reflects and respects the diversity of deafness.

Deafness is not merely a medical condition; it constitutes a profound cultural identity for many within the Deaf community. This community, encompassing Deaf, hard of hearing, Deafblind, deafened, and those with cochlear implants (CIs), reflects a rich tapestry of experiences. Sign language, cultural traditions, and shared experiences are integral to this vibrant community. Terms like “Deaf” honour this identity, acknowledging the cultural heritage and linguistic diversity within the Deaf community.

In medical contexts, terms like “hearing loss” provide clarity for accurate diagnosis and treatment by medical professionals. It’s essential for medical professionals to use this terminology to offer appropriate care and support for individuals experiencing varying degrees of hearing loss.

The intersection of Deaf identity and hearing loss necessitates a balanced approach. Preserving both “Deaf” identity and “hearing loss” terminology allows individuals to navigate these intersections comfortably, accessing necessary resources while embracing their cultural identity.

Words hold power. Embracing terms like “Deaf” which is not a dirty word and “hearing loss” empowers individuals to assert their identity and advocate for their needs, fostering community and solidarity among Deaf individuals. Reclaiming these terms reaffirms the value and dignity of every individual, irrespective of their hearing status.

My advice, approach this intersection with respect and inclusivity, empowering individuals to embrace their identity while receiving their needs.

Don’t overstep!

If you wish to learn more, let’s chat.

More To Explore

A burgundy-tinted graphic shows a woman presenting to colleagues in an office. Large white text reads, “I Can Teach Your Staff, But I Can't Make Your Organization Inclusive,” with a yellow underline. SignAble Vi5ion branding appears at the top and bottom.

I Can Teach Your Staff, But I Can’t Make Your Organization Inclusive

One of the best parts of my job is watching people become more confident after attending my Deaf awareness and accessibility training. Sometimes they arrive feeling nervous about communicating with a Deaf person, unsure about working with interpreters or afraid of doing something wrong. By the end of the session, they’re asking questions, learning a few signs and realizing that communication doesn’t have to be as complicated as

Read More »
A promotional graphic by SignAble Vi5ion Inc. features a person sitting at a desk in front of a laptop, leaning forward with one hand covering their face, suggesting frustration or stress. The background shows an office setting with a muted burgundy overlay. Large white text in the centre reads: “The Assumptions That Keep Deaf People Out of Employment” with a yellow brushstroke underline. At the top, “SignAble Vi5ion Inc.” appears on the left and “@signablevi5ion” on the right. At the bottom, “Leah Riddell” appears on the left, with the SignAble Vi5ion logo on the right.

The Assumptions That Keep Deaf People Out of Employment

One question I often ask during my training sessions is what concerns employers might have about hiring a Deaf person. The answers are usually about communication, safety, productivity or whether the person can keep up in a busy workplace. These concerns may sound reasonable to someone who has never worked with a Deaf colleague, but how many are based on actual experience, and how many are simply assumptions?

Read More »