Resist Terminology Changes: Embrace the Power of Words

Share This Post

Illustration of a light skin woman in short hair wearing glasses and burgundy shirt signing "enough"

Efforts to rename deafness by non-deaf individuals are not new and have historical roots in assimilation attempts of Deaf individuals into hearing culture. The Milan Conference of 1880 serves as a stark example, where sign language was banned for 150 years in favour of oralism, erasing Deaf culture and language.

Currently, some professionals lacking lived experience, such as doctors, audiologists, and Auditory-Verbal Therapists (AVTs), are using euphemistic terms like “hearing differences” or “reduced hearing,” risking perpetuation of this assimilation legacy. It’s similar when people try to use different words instead of “disability.” Learning from history is crucial to ensure language reflects and respects the diversity of deafness.

Deafness is not merely a medical condition; it constitutes a profound cultural identity for many within the Deaf community. This community, encompassing Deaf, hard of hearing, Deafblind, deafened, and those with cochlear implants (CIs), reflects a rich tapestry of experiences. Sign language, cultural traditions, and shared experiences are integral to this vibrant community. Terms like “Deaf” honour this identity, acknowledging the cultural heritage and linguistic diversity within the Deaf community.

In medical contexts, terms like “hearing loss” provide clarity for accurate diagnosis and treatment by medical professionals. It’s essential for medical professionals to use this terminology to offer appropriate care and support for individuals experiencing varying degrees of hearing loss.

The intersection of Deaf identity and hearing loss necessitates a balanced approach. Preserving both “Deaf” identity and “hearing loss” terminology allows individuals to navigate these intersections comfortably, accessing necessary resources while embracing their cultural identity.

Words hold power. Embracing terms like “Deaf” which is not a dirty word and “hearing loss” empowers individuals to assert their identity and advocate for their needs, fostering community and solidarity among Deaf individuals. Reclaiming these terms reaffirms the value and dignity of every individual, irrespective of their hearing status.

My advice, approach this intersection with respect and inclusivity, empowering individuals to embrace their identity while receiving their needs.

Don’t overstep!

If you wish to learn more, let’s chat.

More To Explore

A close-up image of a person holding their hand near their ear, to listen carefully. Text reads: “When Everything Depends on Sound.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

When Everything Depends on Sound

One thing I often ask during training is this: What happens when your environment depends almost entirely on sound? Most people pause for a moment when they really think about it. In workplaces, museums, events, public spaces, and even everyday services, so much information is delivered through announcements, spoken instructions, alarms, names being called out, guided tours, side conversations, or verbal explanations. And because hearing people move through

Read More »
A person gesturing in a workplace, engaged while seated at a desk with notebooks and laptops nearby. Text reads: “Deaf People Shouldn’t Have to Prove They Need Access.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

Deaf People Shouldn’t Have to Prove They Need Access

There’s something exhausting about constantly having to explain why access matters. Not just once, but over and over again. Why an interpreter is needed. Why captions matter. Why sign language access should already be considered before someone walks into the room. Why communication shouldn’t depend on guessing, lipreading, or “trying your best.” For many Deaf people, this starts early. School systems often teach Deaf children to adapt to

Read More »