Year-End Reflection | Looking Ahead to 2026

Share This Post

As this year comes to a close, I want to pause and say thank you.

This year took me into a wide range of spaces, from corporate teams at Nestlé Canada and Baxter, to working alongside CCWESTT project management to ensure their services were accessible, to public institutions, educators, and community organizations across Canada. Alongside this work, I also had the opportunity to teach three different ASL groups, including Sensity, the Emmanuel & Trinity United Churches, and the Kingston Seniors Association, each with their own goals, learning styles, and community contexts.

Beyond training and consultation, this year also included collaborative cultural work, teaming with the 2025 OSD-SJW Alumni Association through Hands in Commemoration, and hosting a De’VIA exhibition with Parrott Art Gallery and the Quinte Arts Council. The gallery experience was intentionally designed to be fully inclusive, with ASL, voice-over, captions, and transcripts, ensuring access across Deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing audiences.

Across every presentation, training, and consultation, one thing became clear. Awareness alone isn’t enough. Real change happens when organizations move beyond surface solutions and start designing communication that works in real time, in real environments.

I’m grateful to the teams and learners who trusted me to walk alongside them, asking thoughtful questions, slowing things down, and addressing the root causes of repeated communication breakdowns rather than applying temporary fixes.

Looking ahead to 2026, I’m excited to continue this work with organizations that are ready to build clarity into their systems, not just their statements. The focus remains the same: fewer breakdowns, stronger teams, and spaces where no one is expected to carry the burden of access alone.

Thank you to everyone who has been part of this journey this year.
I look forward to continuing, and beginning, meaningful work together in the year ahead.

Warmly,
Leah

More To Explore

A person standing with arms crossed in an office setting. Large text over the image reads: “Deaf-Informed Isn’t Enough.” SignAble Vi5ion branding appears at the top, with Leah Riddell’s name and the SignAble Vi5ion logo at the bottom.

Deaf-Informed Isn’t Enough

Lately, I’ve been hearing a familiar phrase more often: “This project is Deaf-informed.” It sounds promising. It suggests care, consultation, and inclusion. But here’s the truth: Deaf-informed isn’t the same as Deaf-led. and the difference matters. Deaf-Informed Still Keeps Power Elsewhere In many projects, Deaf people are brought in to review materials, validate signs, or provide feedback after decisions have already been made. That’s Deaf-informed. The structure is

Read More »
A person presenting in front of charts and graphs on a wall. Text over the image reads: “What Deaf-Led Actually Means,” with “Deaf-Led” circled in yellow. SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

What Deaf-Led Actually Means

“Deaf-led” is becoming a popular phrase. It shows up in grant applications.On websites.In project proposals.Across social media. But too often, it’s used loosely, sometimes even strategically, without a real understanding of what it requires. So let’s talk about what Deaf-led actually means. Deaf-Led Is Not Deaf-Informed Inviting Deaf people to review content is not Deaf-led. Hiring Deaf consultants for sign-off is not Deaf-led. Paying Deaf creators for videos

Read More »