Access to the Room Is Not Access to the Conversation

Share This Post

Sometimes we think accessibility is complete once everyone is in the room.

The interpreter is booked. Captions are available. The Deaf employee has been invited to the meeting. Everything looks accessible, so we assume the job is done.

But being able to enter the conversation and being able to participate in it are two different things.

I’ve been in meetings where an interpreter was right there, but people talked over one another, turned away while speaking, jumped from topic to topic, or moved on before I had an opportunity to respond. By the time I received the information and was ready to contribute, the conversation had already gone somewhere else.

Technically, I had access.

But did I really have equal participation?

This is something I try to help people understand in my training. An interpreter doesn’t change how a meeting operates. Captions don’t fix a conversation where everyone is talking at once. Technology doesn’t automatically make a workplace inclusive.

We still have to think about how we communicate with each other.

There is also a natural delay when information moves between languages. Someone speaks, the interpreter processes the message and signs it. I receive it, think about my response and begin signing. My response is then interpreted back into spoken English. Meanwhile, hearing people can sometimes already be three comments ahead.

That doesn’t mean the Deaf person has nothing to say. Sometimes the conversation simply hasn’t made room for them to say it.

I’ve also experienced another side of this. Someone asks me a question, but then looks at the interpreter while waiting for the answer. Or they direct their question to the interpreter instead of me. The interpreter may be providing communication access, but I’m still the person in the conversation.

These may seem like little things, but little things tell people whether they truly belong in the room.

A good accessible meeting doesn’t need to feel awkward or overly controlled. People don’t need to be afraid to speak. Sometimes it only takes a little awareness: one person at a time, allowing a moment before changing topics, making sure people can see each other, and speaking directly to the Deaf person rather than the interpreter.

Once teams understand why these things matter, they usually adjust very quickly.

And that’s one of my favourite parts of training. You can see that lightbulb moment when people realize accessibility isn’t only about what you provide. It’s also about how you include someone once they’re there.

Getting someone into the room is important.

Making sure they have an equal place in the conversation is what makes that access meaningful.

More To Explore

A professional sits at a table and gestures with one finger raised during a conversation. Large white text reads “Being Told Later Is Not the Same as Being Included,” with a yellow underline beneath the title. SignAble Vi5ion Inc. branding appears at the top, with Leah Riddell’s name and the SignAble Vi5ion logo at the bottom.

Being Told Later Is Not the Same as Being Included

This takes the last blog one step further, but it isn’t the same issue. The last one was about participation in the room. This one is about what happens when information is constantly passed to a Deaf person after the moment has already happened. I have heard some version of this many times throughout my life and work. “I’ll tell you later.” Usually, the person means well. A

Read More »

Access to the Room Is Not Access to the Conversation

Sometimes we think accessibility is complete once everyone is in the room. The interpreter is booked. Captions are available. The Deaf employee has been invited to the meeting. Everything looks accessible, so we assume the job is done. But being able to enter the conversation and being able to participate in it are two different things. I’ve been in meetings where an interpreter was right there, but people

Read More »