When Access Depends on Asking

A person typing on a laptop with a form on the screen. Text reads: “Access Should Not Depend on Asking.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

Share This Post

Access is often framed as something available, as long as someone asks. Organizations say things like, “Let us know what you need,” or “Request accommodation in advance.” On the surface, this sounds reasonable. It suggests openness and willingness to support.

But it also shifts responsibility onto the person who is already facing the barrier.

When access depends on asking, it becomes conditional rather than structural. For many Deaf individuals, this means navigating the same process over and over again; explaining needs, following up, waiting for confirmation, and sometimes adjusting expectations when support is not available. It is not a one-time request. It is ongoing labour, and much of that labour goes unseen.

Requesting access requires time, energy, and confidence. It assumes that the individual knows what to ask for, feels comfortable advocating for themselves, and trusts that the response will be positive. That is not always the case. Some people choose not to ask because they are tired of explaining. Others hesitate because of past experiences where their needs were dismissed or minimized. In some situations, individuals avoid asking altogether to prevent being seen as difficult.

As a result, they attend without full access, or they choose not to attend at all.

When organizations rely on requests to trigger accessibility, they unintentionally create a reactive system. Access is only provided after a need is identified, rather than being built into the environment from the start. This approach places the burden on individuals instead of addressing the structure itself.

True inclusion works differently. It anticipates need. It recognizes patterns and understands that if one person requires access, others likely do as well. It reduces the need for repeated requests by ensuring that baseline accessibility is already in place.

This does not mean every situation can be predicted or standardized. There will always be moments where individual needs require conversation and flexibility. But foundational access should never depend on whether someone asks.

It should exist because it was planned.

Shifting toward this approach requires a change in mindset. Instead of asking, “What do you need?” organizations can begin by asking, “What should already be in place?” That shift moves access from reactive to proactive, and from conditional to expected.

It also respects people’s time, energy, and dignity.

More To Explore

A group seated in a workshop, smiling and engaged as one person stands and leads the discussion. Text reads: “What Happens When Access Is Done Right.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

What Happens When Access Is Done Right

There’s a difference you can feel right away. You walk into a space and you’re not trying to figure things out. You’re not scanning the room wondering how you’re going to follow what’s happening or who you need to talk to. It’s already been considered. You can just be there. That’s what it looks like when access is done right. I saw this recently working with META Employment

Read More »
A vintage-style image of Alexander Graham Bell seated and writing, shown in a sepia tone. Overlaid text reads: “The History We Don’t Fully Talk About.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

The History We Don’t Fully Talk About

I saw something recently that made me pause. It was about Alexander Graham Bell. Most people know him for the telephone. That’s usually where the story starts and ends; innovation, progress, communication. But there’s another part of that history that doesn’t get talked about as often. And it still shows up today. Bell’s connection to the Deaf community was personal. His mother was deaf, and sign language was

Read More »