When Access Depends on Asking

A person typing on a laptop with a form on the screen. Text reads: “Access Should Not Depend on Asking.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

Share This Post

Access is often framed as something available, as long as someone asks. Organizations say things like, “Let us know what you need,” or “Request accommodation in advance.” On the surface, this sounds reasonable. It suggests openness and willingness to support.

But it also shifts responsibility onto the person who is already facing the barrier.

When access depends on asking, it becomes conditional rather than structural. For many Deaf individuals, this means navigating the same process over and over again; explaining needs, following up, waiting for confirmation, and sometimes adjusting expectations when support is not available. It is not a one-time request. It is ongoing labour, and much of that labour goes unseen.

Requesting access requires time, energy, and confidence. It assumes that the individual knows what to ask for, feels comfortable advocating for themselves, and trusts that the response will be positive. That is not always the case. Some people choose not to ask because they are tired of explaining. Others hesitate because of past experiences where their needs were dismissed or minimized. In some situations, individuals avoid asking altogether to prevent being seen as difficult.

As a result, they attend without full access, or they choose not to attend at all.

When organizations rely on requests to trigger accessibility, they unintentionally create a reactive system. Access is only provided after a need is identified, rather than being built into the environment from the start. This approach places the burden on individuals instead of addressing the structure itself.

True inclusion works differently. It anticipates need. It recognizes patterns and understands that if one person requires access, others likely do as well. It reduces the need for repeated requests by ensuring that baseline accessibility is already in place.

This does not mean every situation can be predicted or standardized. There will always be moments where individual needs require conversation and flexibility. But foundational access should never depend on whether someone asks.

It should exist because it was planned.

Shifting toward this approach requires a change in mindset. Instead of asking, “What do you need?” organizations can begin by asking, “What should already be in place?” That shift moves access from reactive to proactive, and from conditional to expected.

It also respects people’s time, energy, and dignity.

More To Explore

Two people sitting across from each other, one appearing unsure. Text reads: “Knowing Signs Isn’t the Same as Communicating.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

Knowing Signs Isn’t the Same as Communicating

I see this come up a lot. People learn signs. They attend classes, pick up vocabulary, and can recognize what’s being said. On paper, it looks like progress. But when it comes time to actually use it, something shifts. They hesitate. They second guess. They freeze. It’s easy to think that means they didn’t learn enough, but that’s usually not the case. The issue is that knowing signs

Read More »
A small group sitting together at a table, engaged in a relaxed discussion. Text reads: “Inclusion Changes More Than We Expect.” SignAble Vi5ion branding and Leah Riddell’s name appear on the image.

Inclusion Benefits More Than You Think

Inclusion is often talked about as something we do for a specific group. It’s framed as support, or accommodation, or something that needs to be added in when someone requires it. But that’s not what I see in practice. What I see is that when we make something more accessible for one person, it ends up improving the experience for others too. When communication is clearer, more people

Read More »